Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/1053Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | SARMA, Y R | - |
| dc.contributor.author | NAMBIAR, K K N | - |
| dc.contributor.author | BRAHMA, R N | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-12-22T05:17:13Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2017-12-22T05:17:13Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 1980 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | In: Venkata Ram C S, Chandra Mouli B, Gopalakrishnan K, Kandasamy C, Muraleedharan N & Swaminathan P, (Eds), PLACROSYM ɪɪ : Entomology, microbiology, nematology, Plant pathology and Rodentology of Plantation Crops, pp.386-397, Indian Society of Plantation Crops | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1053 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | In the germplasm collection none of the types showed reasonable tolerance to diseases. Field control trials with different fungicides showed different degrees of protection, which varied from year to year. Dexon, Methoxy ethyl merucuric chloride gava better protection as compared to others. The cultural practices viz. flat bed method and ridges and furrow method VS with and without dolomite application, did’nt show significant difference in disease reduction. The results are discussed and future line of work suggested. | en_US |
| dc.subject | ginger | en_US |
| dc.subject | germplasm | en_US |
| dc.title | STUDIES ON RHIZOME ROT OF GINGER AND ITS CONTROL | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | CROP PROTECTION | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SARMA-002.pdf | 8.47 MB | Adobe PDF |  View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.